| Country Sacrifices and Environmental Issues Essay Good thesis writing Essay done for you

Environmental issues form a very important part of global and local policy. This is because with the rising levels of climate change and global warming, experts advise that human activity on the environment must be kept in close watch. This means that in one way or the other, counties must make sacrifices towards the same goal. Perhaps most of these sacrifices are made in terms of trade ramifications. Put in other words, there are businesses that negatively affect the environment. One of the examples of environmentally unfriendly practices in the U.S. is the indirect industrial production of greenhouse gases. With the adoption of global environmental policies, countries have had to comply with international dictates.

According to Frankel (2008), Washington had to enact long-term policies that would see reduction in the production of greenhouse gases in 2008. Specifically, legislation was passed that barred the country from importing goods from countries which did not comply with global environmental policies such as the Kyoto Protocol. Frankel (2008) notes that in the next few years, the sacrifices made by countries would entail engaging in businesses that are not competitive: competitive businesses always harm the environment. In addition, in compliance to the Kyoto Protocol, countries are required to adjust their taxes, tariffs, measures, penalties, barriers, sanctions and controls over environment-related exports. In addition, the U.S. and the U.K. are required to forgo their gains from exports by implementing economic sanctions to countries that do not comply with the provisions of the Kyoto Protocol and other environment agreements at the global front

Historical Context, Political Attitude and Constitution

An understanding of historical context is fundamental to designing more effective policies in the future. This is because in most cases, present climate change patterns were triggered by past environmental mismanagement and exploitation. Since the present is a consequence of the past, the future will be a consequence of the environmental and human activities that are presently being carried out. However, the political class does not put environment at the top of their agenda. Historically, the U.S. has been reluctant to ratify most environmental agreements arrived at during international conventions. One of the possible explanations is the fact that the political class and the business community have conspired to continue benefiting from businesses centered on industrial manufacturing that adversely affects the atmosphere. This is seen as contrary to the constitutional provisions of ‘domestic tranquility’ and ‘general welfare’ to all Americans.

Other than the complete lack of political will, there are also purposeful steps by the government of the U.S. to influence the international policies on the environment. Through such a move, America will be able to protect its economic interests. According to Schmitt (2010), the contributions of the private sector, the state and the federal government are greatly restrained by Article 1 Section 8 Clause 3, which has to do with commerce. In order to overhaul this situation, there is a need to change the political attitudes to conform with the dreams of conservation as enshrined in the constitution.