| Cultural Competence Essay Good thesis writing Essay done for you
The cultural competence is a developmental process that evolves over an extended period. The cultural competence continuum is the skills, various levels of awareness and knowledge at both individuals and organizations. In business community an individual can damage its self esteem and career but the observable psychological impact on the victims is unnoticed which can threat the class of action that brings to the light for them.
There are four cognitive components:
Awareness: it is the consciousness of ones personal reactions to persons who are different.
Attitude: the component in the order to emphasize the different training that increases the awareness about the cultural bias and beliefs. In general, the training that has participants which can examine their own beliefs and values about the cultural differences.
Knowledge: the knowledge does not need any definition because it is itself a complete package which is important part of cultural competence development. The research indicates the total values and beliefs about the equality in the inconsistent with the behaviors.
Skills: it only focuses on practicing the competence to perform the perfection. Communication is the fundamental tool which helps the people to interact in the organizations. This also includes the gestures and the non verbal communication which tends to vary from culture to culture.
There are set of four components of our competence definition which consists of awareness, attitude, knowledge and skills. It is the diagnostic and intervention development benefits that make the approach most appealing. The achievement gap between cultural minority and majority students suggests that some sort of communication disconnect often occurs in minority.
The cultural conflicts include:
Role of women in the family.
The decisions which are taken by the head in the family.
Practices among cultural groups.
Symbol systems among cultural group.
The core of any things can challenge the traditional security paradigm has a strong scurity critique. The objectives of the security infrastructure widening well beyond the preservation of state integrity.
Firstly you have to take care of defining the security and the relevant threats? Secondly the feasibility of measuring the human security. Third, I will use human rights abuses as an example of how a threshold-based definition sets criteria for the inclusion of some, but not all, threats in any different component of human security.
The individual can describe a societal contract in which the security of the individual has the central principle. If the person can not be free from his fears which cannot give the guarantee which is not as effective member of a political relationship.
The liberal perspective is the most wide spread in the world. The vital role of an individual is its safety which cannot be best achieved as a consequence of security of the state and thus acts as a protector for both external and internal threats.
The protection is the absolute responsibility of the state. The security or the protection of the citizen is the liberty of all the individual rights to the country. Liberal philosophic writings, its practical manifestation are representative toward the dominant traditional security paradigm.
The security primarily relies on anarchistic balance of the power the military build up of two super powers and the absolute sovereignty of the nation state. Security analysis to be entirely rational entities, with the maximization of power guiding national interests and policy.
Protection was provided by technical and military capabilities; and wars were never to be fought on home soilrather, proxy wars were used if direct combat were necessary. There are two types of security:
1. Traditional security the integrity of the state is the responsibility should be followed. The possible threats are the interstate war, nuclear proliferation and revolution.
2. Human security the individual is the object, the integrity of the individual is the responsibility to be protected. The possible threats are disease, poverty, natural disaster, violence, landmines and human rights abuses.
The faith placed in the realist worldview, and the security it provided, masked the actual issues threatening the individual. The concepts can move away from a focus on inter state relations, human security which takes the most dramatically step by making the referent object of the state but the individual. Direct research and policy towards the actual issues threatening peoples lives.
The focus on state security must be extended to include supranational systems. The range of included harms must be broadened to include serious threats to either. Security is no longer a narrow defined as the absence of conflicts between the two states. Adopt a much more coordinated approach to a range of issues.